if ( is_singular() ) wp_enqueue_script( 'comment-reply' );
Douglas Johnson

Douglas Johnson

Sunday 13 January 2008

So, the shit hits the fan…

…and fails miserably.

Recently, the amount of irrational ad hominems and racism directed at Obama has increased. No surprise there. The right-wing gutter press (actually, make that all the right-wing press) in the USA is well known for campaigning about people, not politics. They’ve already torn Clinton to shreds, wildly designating her a feminist because…she’s a woman.

And she’s (unofficially, of course) joined in now, as she needs to distract people from the mud that stuck to her…

Fortunately, what they’ve managed to dig up just doesn’t stick to Obama. Let’s look at the three primary accusation hurled at Obama:

- His middle name is Hussein, so he simply must be a Muslim.
- His pastor is black, and most of the people who go to his church are black - and they don’t try to hide it.
- He bought a house from and next-to a supporter who was later discovered to have indulged in some dodgy deals.

I’m not sure I need to tear those apart, as most are so simply self-satirising that it seems pointless. Sometimes they simply break each other. They say he’s a Muslim - and then criticise him for the (Christian) church he goes to.

Am I the only one that sees the contradiction there?

Beyond these contradictions, a lot of it simply doesn’t work - at least for someone with the slightest hint of rationality. He’s got a name of muslim origin. Great. There are a lot of people in America with, say, Russian names. Does that make them ex-communists because the country their family came from was communist? No. And the same logic applies to every other name, including muslim ones…

He’s a member of a church with a proudly black pastor and a largely black congregation. He joined it when he was acting as a community organiser in a (largely black) community. I somehow fail to feel shock here. It probably doesn’t help me that religion has played no overt part in his campaign, and that logically, therefore, neither has the church…

Or it could be that I’m not a bigot, I don’t know.

As for the house, I again fail to be impressed. Obama’s already handed $37,000 of the man’s donations to charity. More than that, allegations about dodgy gifts have already failed to make an impact on other candidates’ campaigns. Remember when the GOP establishment made such a fuss about all those gifts Huckabee had received as governor? Remember that Huckabee promptly went on to trounce the other candidates in Iowa? Corruption smears aren’t sticking at the moment.

Besides, compared to a lot of the outright corruption in US presidential politics, this looks like an honest mistake…

Of course, far more of this dirt will stick than I seem to be giving credit for. Various sections of the electorate will no doubt latch on to certain allegations and declare Obama some sort of black satan for them. But somehow, I don’t think many of them would have voted for him in the first place. There’s a paragraph in the Guardian article which rather neatly summarises what I mean:

As they digested their candidate’s win, a group of four McCain supporters drank beer and contemplated the imminent arrival of black Democratic hopeful Barack Obama. ‘You know what Barack Obama’s middle name is?’ asked one. ‘Hussein,’ he said, answering his own question. The sharp intakes of breath by his companions said more than words.”

Note: “Four McCain supporters.” McCain. Does that sound like Obama - or Democrat - to you?

People will remember everything thrown at Obama. There’s no doubt about that. But the people who’ll remember aren’t the ones the GOP shit-machine was hoping to catch. They’re already voting Republican.

More from Douglas Johnson | Printer-friendly version
Posted in: 2008 Election, Abroad, Primaries, USA

3 Responses to “So, the shit hits the fan…”

  1. R.E. Vamp says:

    Actually, Obama -has- made religion a focal point of his campaign, albeit briefly. Last year he had part of his campaign using gospel singers and including speeches by preachers, one of whom was a notorious homophobe.

    As far as I can tell this was only to get black voters to A) Notice and B) Accept him but it seems that success in Iowa managed that perfectly well and I hope that this will mean that he is able to take South Carolina with some degree of ease. Bizarrely for all of last year Clinton was leading him in terms of black popularity, often by a substantial amount.

    He quickly dropped that approach, long before the Iowa victory in fact, but it is notable that it was there.

    Of all the candidates, though, Obama has been by -far- the one most openly and firmly committed to stamping out American homophobia and has even said as much in front of black evangelical audiences. As AS pointed out at the time it is hard to conceive of Clinton doing as much amongst any crowd save one arranged by a specific homosexual organisation.

    The rest of your article was great. I should add, though, that many of the nastiest claims originate from unknown sources. You could presume that it was Republicans but I have faint suspicions that the shit-machine that birthed them may instead belong to Hillary…

    No evidence for that, I’m afraid, I just can’t imagine them trying to sabotage the one man able to halt her run at the presidency. Tactically that makes sense but the bigots HATE Hillary so much that I doubt rational thought really comes into it.

    So who does that leave?

  2. Oh, I agree that a lot of it quite probably is coming from Clinton. But my point was more that it’s not really going to put huge numbers of Democrat voters off, whatever it is - only the sort of bigots that already vote Republican.

  3. R.E. Vamp says:

    “Oh, I agree that a lot of it quite probably is coming from Clinton. But my point was more that it’s not really going to put huge numbers of Democrat voters off, whatever it is - only the sort of bigots that already vote Republican.”

    Oh, sorry. I really should not have misunderstood, that was a very basic point and one which makes total sense.

    What she is aiming at the Democrats is the “Obama is inexperienced” meme, which has the natural conclusion of “Thus will be incompetent”. She shied away from repeating it in Meet The Press today but it is otherwise ubiquitous, even after the weepy moment she rolled relentlessly onwards into asserting her immense superiority over him.

Post a Comment